asp.net mvc - What is your opinion of the Telerik Extensions for MVC? -


I started digging around with using it. They are not unmatched in their current projects, but I can reconstruct things to fit it.

But, I'm thinking that it will be worth it at the end. I am searching for reviews on extensions, I have not seen much because I am asking here.

They claim on their website:

A postback of lightweight, i.e. the extensions that you fully benefit, for your web application, ASP.NET MVC model of no viewstrate, and no page life cycle.

So I'm curious, What do you think about telereak extensions for MVC?

A telecommand extension for ASP.NET MVC is a new suite targeting our ASP.NET MVC platform. It started from the ground and there is nothing related to the red control for ASP.Net Ajax (our webform product), excluding features and scenes. It does not make any sense, no postback web control. It comes with source code (licensed under GPLv2), so it can be easily verified. In a word we have controlled the webform ASP.NET MVC, the statement is wrong.

In fact RadControls (our WebForms product) support ASP.NET MVC applications for ASP.NET Ajax. Although I believe that all features which require viewstate (for example, underlying editing in Wright Ground) do not work, nor will they ever work. We recommend using red control inside the ASP.NET MVC application. , If the necessary ingredient has not yet been implemented in the MVC product line (which is still taking the steps of his child and has 4 UI extensions). Of course, we have to release more UI Extensions to match our plans to the webform suite.

For any technical questions or suggestions you can contact us at our online forum. We try to answer every single post.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to capture HTTP packet with SharpPcap -

jquery - SimpleModal Confirm fails to submit form -

php - Multiple Select with Explode: only returns the word "Array" -