SQL Server 2008 Failover Cluster on Cluster Shared Volumes? -


Anyone can reason that SQL Server 2008 does not use cluster shared volumes for failure cluster databases and log files can do?

It seems that using CSV should reduce the failure time and reduce the complexity of the cluster group configuration (physical drive resources will no longer need to "fail").

I think, but 100% are not sure, Microsoft bans the fact that on CSV what might happen.

Of course, you put the VHD there, this is the whole thing. And VHD may contain database data and log files - who knows what's inside "VHD"

However, I do not know what you are trying to do CSV is there, so a single segment (i.e., a single LUN on a SAN) is separated by different cluster members. - Can be shared with different files. Specifically, information about VM definition and VHD creation.

Earlier, one had to put VM definition and VHD in different LUNs, so that it could proceed individually. There was nothing "wrong" with the other than the complexity of having so many Eluyen.

Database files are different You do not have too many they are big. You want to place them carefully and see them. e.t.c.

If you just put the database file inside the VHD, as it is originally said, it is all easy, except that you probably will not receive detailed treatment.

If you put database files in a separate LUN, you have all the detailed treatments and the LUN fails easily ...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to capture HTTP packet with SharpPcap -

php - Multiple Select with Explode: only returns the word "Array" -

php - jQuery AJAX Post not working -