asynchronous - Same Machine Erlang communication -

-

To help me understand what approach I should take for interface with Erlang, I need to answer the following question: I <...

The AFAIK Eerling uses a multi-process approach on a SMP Unix box in this case it should do the same machine IPC.

  1. Does Eranang use the Unix domain socket for UNIX?

  2. Does it use name-pipe for windows?

  3. If it does not apply the above two structures - that is, not designated pipes for windows; It has to fallback on sockets on windows.

  4. How are the principles given above implemented, whether they use message oriented, thread per single channel, asynchronous structure or something else?

  5. If my line of argument is wrong, does it use a master-hair tree and all other processes indirectly - through the master?

- 1 -

for Erring Binary Format Documentation.

The Universal Consent That Unix Domain Sockets Performs Better I think that I will try to expand Erlang to use the better preferences provided. I also strongly suspect that APOL and windows IOPC are not used in TCP / IP event loop - I will post back after auditing the code.

One more says that altong, in reality, does not support anything other than TCP and UDP.

There are two erasing libraries for communication and

Ergon allows unix dome socket to be opened under UNIX.

R1 This TCP / IP (In fact, any "standard" support for Unix domain sockets Is not)

R2 I am pretty sure that it is still TCP / IP sockets

see R3 R2

for R4 Erlang A binary currency format is appropriate and this message is based on. Exchange can either be synced (like RPC-like) or async.

R5 No Master.

As a bonus (to help you save time): Inter-node communication (using a registered name (-ai name or-name) to use either RPC Do not forget or whatever).


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to capture HTTP packet with SharpPcap -

-
I would like to capture all incoming HTTP packets on my machine. To do this, I am using SharpPcap which is a WinPcap The cover is. SharpPcap works very well, but it captures TCP packets and what it wants to do for me is a very low level. Does anyone know how can I easily get full HTTP requests / reactions from all these TCP packets? Thanks SharpPcap is already able to capture the packet in the same way That's what the virus does (just in the code instead of the GUI). And you can either either parse them directly or you can put them in the drive in the common .pcap file format. The steps to parse the capture are: Open a connection at any time Loop a while Or start capturing using an event callback Parsing the raw packet for the type you want If you are reading .PPP dump files In addition to calling you an offline capture reader is almost the same, there is no need to select an interface, and you can set the majority There is no need to do the modes. All st...
Read more

php - Multiple Select with Explode: only returns the word "Array" -

-
By using Wordpress I have created a multiple selection box so that users can select categories to exclude. When the page is initially loaded, I see my predefined default option. However, when I select a new value and I save ... I only see the word "Array" and have not chosen anything else? & lt; Class = "amultiple" id = "& lt; php echo $ value ['id'] ;? gt;" name = "& gt; php echo $ value ['id'] ;; gt; []" Multiple = "multiple" size = "8" & gt; & Lt ;? Php global option; Foreign currency ($ value as value $) {if (get_settings ($ value ['id']) === FALSE {$$ value ['id'] = $ value ['std']; } And {$$ value ['id'] = get_settings ($ value ['id']); }} $ Ranges = & amp; Amp; Categories ('type = post & orderbiz = name & amp; hide_empty = 1'); If ($ ranges) {$ ex_cat = implode (',', $ tt_cat_exclude); Forex Currency ($ range a...
Read more

jquery - SimpleModal Confirm fails to submit form -

-
I am trying to confirm jQuery to show yes / no confirmation when I submit a form. I had modified (in the last list) to capture and block form submissions. However, it only works with jQuery 1.2.6, a recent upgrade stops 1.3.2, if yes is clicked, then by submitting the form. But I can not understand what is wrong / inconsistent in my code now. Demo (which works in both versions of a simple window.href implementation). $ (document) .ready (function () {$ ('input.delete'). Click (function (e) {e.preventDefault (); var target = $ (e .target); Confirm ("Really delete this event?", Function () {target.click ()});});}); How about something like this? The idea of ​​catching clicks (and fire!) On the submitted event is not click event. $ (document) .ready (function () {$ ('# myForm'). Submit (function () {var f = this; Confirm (" Remove? ", Function () {$ (f). Submit ();}) Return; Return the initial session;}}}}; Hope That this is som...
Read more