compiler construction - Byte precision pointer arithmetic in C when sizeof(char) != 1 -

-

How can a portable single byte pointer with precision accuracy?

Note that:

  • Four is not 1 byte on all platforms
  • sizeof (zero) == 1 is available as an extension only in GCC
  • Although some platforms may have Pointer Dareb Pointer alignment restrictions, arithmetic can still be compared to the minimum basic POD type size Better granularity may be required

your impression error Ipuarn is - sizeof (char) defined is to be the first everywhere. Out of section 6.5.3.4 ("size operator"):

(para 2)

Size of operator operator (bytes) in your Operand, which can be an expression or some type of parenthesis.

(para 3)

Type four, unsigned char, or signed four, (or its eligible version) result1.

When they move together, it becomes clear that in C, whatever size there is, this size is a "byte" (even if it is more than 8 bits , On some platforms)

A char is therefore the smallest addressable type if you need to know in small units from char , at the same time Char to read and use bitwise operators four which you want.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to capture HTTP packet with SharpPcap -

-
I would like to capture all incoming HTTP packets on my machine. To do this, I am using SharpPcap which is a WinPcap The cover is. SharpPcap works very well, but it captures TCP packets and what it wants to do for me is a very low level. Does anyone know how can I easily get full HTTP requests / reactions from all these TCP packets? Thanks SharpPcap is already able to capture the packet in the same way That's what the virus does (just in the code instead of the GUI). And you can either either parse them directly or you can put them in the drive in the common .pcap file format. The steps to parse the capture are: Open a connection at any time Loop a while Or start capturing using an event callback Parsing the raw packet for the type you want If you are reading .PPP dump files In addition to calling you an offline capture reader is almost the same, there is no need to select an interface, and you can set the majority There is no need to do the modes. All st...
Read more

php - Multiple Select with Explode: only returns the word "Array" -

-
By using Wordpress I have created a multiple selection box so that users can select categories to exclude. When the page is initially loaded, I see my predefined default option. However, when I select a new value and I save ... I only see the word "Array" and have not chosen anything else? & lt; Class = "amultiple" id = "& lt; php echo $ value ['id'] ;? gt;" name = "& gt; php echo $ value ['id'] ;; gt; []" Multiple = "multiple" size = "8" & gt; & Lt ;? Php global option; Foreign currency ($ value as value $) {if (get_settings ($ value ['id']) === FALSE {$$ value ['id'] = $ value ['std']; } And {$$ value ['id'] = get_settings ($ value ['id']); }} $ Ranges = & amp; Amp; Categories ('type = post & orderbiz = name & amp; hide_empty = 1'); If ($ ranges) {$ ex_cat = implode (',', $ tt_cat_exclude); Forex Currency ($ range a...
Read more

jquery - SimpleModal Confirm fails to submit form -

-
I am trying to confirm jQuery to show yes / no confirmation when I submit a form. I had modified (in the last list) to capture and block form submissions. However, it only works with jQuery 1.2.6, a recent upgrade stops 1.3.2, if yes is clicked, then by submitting the form. But I can not understand what is wrong / inconsistent in my code now. Demo (which works in both versions of a simple window.href implementation). $ (document) .ready (function () {$ ('input.delete'). Click (function (e) {e.preventDefault (); var target = $ (e .target); Confirm ("Really delete this event?", Function () {target.click ()});});}); How about something like this? The idea of ​​catching clicks (and fire!) On the submitted event is not click event. $ (document) .ready (function () {$ ('# myForm'). Submit (function () {var f = this; Confirm (" Remove? ", Function () {$ (f). Submit ();}) Return; Return the initial session;}}}}; Hope That this is som...
Read more