version control - Subversion oddity - svn info revision higher than last changed rev on project folder -

-

I'm not understood anything.

There is a working copy of my project - updated svn update (which says: update for the 18th amendment), I know that this is the latest when I click on the svn info < Code>, the amendment is 1895, but the last modified Rev 1888 is.

Inspecting logs using TortoiseSVN shows as 1888 final revision, there is no trace of 1895. In 1895 a svn log is empty, and between 1895 and 1888, a svn diff is also empty, that is, there is no difference.

How did I end up with some rogue amendments that have not really changed anything? It basically produces the build server (thinks it is in 1888) with my MSBuild SvnVersion function being out of sync (thinks the modification is 1895).

Any suggestions appreciated.

Edit: If the amendment will always show the latest amendments for the entire repository, it means that the SVN Varsian MSBuild function (which uses svnversion.exe but similar Things like showing behavior) do not show correct correction when you have a multi-project single repository, you will need to use "last modified Rev" for your version number.

As a result, now I have to do my own Swanleste Cheng Avevo MSBuild work roll.

This is not a problem or oddity ... the amendment number applies to the entire Subversion repository, and Therefore, the amendment number may be higher due to changes in the repository compared to the previous revision number, something changed in the branch of the repository on which you are working.

To clarify, if you are committed to trunk , to modify the repository to 10, and then the branches and Tags 1000, then "last modified amendment" for 10 trunk folder, but the current revision number of the entire repository will be 1000.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to capture HTTP packet with SharpPcap -

-
I would like to capture all incoming HTTP packets on my machine. To do this, I am using SharpPcap which is a WinPcap The cover is. SharpPcap works very well, but it captures TCP packets and what it wants to do for me is a very low level. Does anyone know how can I easily get full HTTP requests / reactions from all these TCP packets? Thanks SharpPcap is already able to capture the packet in the same way That's what the virus does (just in the code instead of the GUI). And you can either either parse them directly or you can put them in the drive in the common .pcap file format. The steps to parse the capture are: Open a connection at any time Loop a while Or start capturing using an event callback Parsing the raw packet for the type you want If you are reading .PPP dump files In addition to calling you an offline capture reader is almost the same, there is no need to select an interface, and you can set the majority There is no need to do the modes. All st...
Read more

php - Multiple Select with Explode: only returns the word "Array" -

-
By using Wordpress I have created a multiple selection box so that users can select categories to exclude. When the page is initially loaded, I see my predefined default option. However, when I select a new value and I save ... I only see the word "Array" and have not chosen anything else? & lt; Class = "amultiple" id = "& lt; php echo $ value ['id'] ;? gt;" name = "& gt; php echo $ value ['id'] ;; gt; []" Multiple = "multiple" size = "8" & gt; & Lt ;? Php global option; Foreign currency ($ value as value $) {if (get_settings ($ value ['id']) === FALSE {$$ value ['id'] = $ value ['std']; } And {$$ value ['id'] = get_settings ($ value ['id']); }} $ Ranges = & amp; Amp; Categories ('type = post & orderbiz = name & amp; hide_empty = 1'); If ($ ranges) {$ ex_cat = implode (',', $ tt_cat_exclude); Forex Currency ($ range a...
Read more

jquery - SimpleModal Confirm fails to submit form -

-
I am trying to confirm jQuery to show yes / no confirmation when I submit a form. I had modified (in the last list) to capture and block form submissions. However, it only works with jQuery 1.2.6, a recent upgrade stops 1.3.2, if yes is clicked, then by submitting the form. But I can not understand what is wrong / inconsistent in my code now. Demo (which works in both versions of a simple window.href implementation). $ (document) .ready (function () {$ ('input.delete'). Click (function (e) {e.preventDefault (); var target = $ (e .target); Confirm ("Really delete this event?", Function () {target.click ()});});}); How about something like this? The idea of ​​catching clicks (and fire!) On the submitted event is not click event. $ (document) .ready (function () {$ ('# myForm'). Submit (function () {var f = this; Confirm (" Remove? ", Function () {$ (f). Submit ();}) Return; Return the initial session;}}}}; Hope That this is som...
Read more